Skip to content

vm2 NodeVM can replace the host process TLS trust store

Critical severity GitHub Reviewed Published Aug 24, 2026 in patriksimek/vm2 • Updated Oct 1, 2026

Package

npm vm2 (npm)

Affected versions

>= 3.11.3, <= 3.11.6

Patched versions

3.11.7

Description

Summary

vm2 3.11.6 exposes the host tls module to a NodeVM when that builtin is explicitly allowed. Although the module object is wrapped as read-only, its functions still execute against process-wide host state. On Node.js versions that provide tls.setDefaultCACertificates(), sandbox code can replace the certificate authorities trusted by subsequent host-realm TLS clients.

The exploit needs only the narrowly allowed tls and url builtins. It does not require fs, process, module, child_process, an external package, or a general '*' builtin grant. A host HTTPS request rejected an attacker certificate before sandbox execution, then accepted the same certificate and returned an application marker after the sandbox replaced the default CA list.

This crosses the intended sandbox boundary. An attacker can make host HTTPS clients trust an attacker-controlled CA, enabling credential theft and response tampering when the attacker can influence a subsequent destination or network path. Replacing the list also removes the normal trust roots, disrupting unrelated host TLS traffic.

Details

The vulnerable boundary is the default builtin loader in lib/builtin.js. Builtins that are not classified as dangerous are exposed through a recursive read-only bridge:

builtins.set(key, special ? special : vm => vm.readonly(hostRequire(key)));

The read-only wrapper prevents ordinary property assignment through the sandbox proxy. It does not make calls such as tls.setDefaultCACertificates() sandbox-local. That function changes the default CA list for the current Node.js thread and affects subsequent TLS connections that do not provide their own ca option.

The dangerous-builtin list now rejects dns because dns.setServers() mutates process-wide host networking state. It does not reject tls, even though current Node.js exposes an equivalent process-wide trust mutation through it.

A direct call with a normal sandbox array is not necessary. The native TLS function requires an actual host-realm array. The allowed host url module provides one:

const tls = require('tls');
const {URLSearchParams} = require('url');

const hostArray = new URLSearchParams(
  'ca=' + encodeURIComponent(attackerCaPem)
).getAll('ca');

tls.setDefaultCACertificates(hostArray);

URLSearchParams.getAll() executes in the host realm and returns a host array containing the attacker-controlled PEM string. vm2 maps that array into the sandbox. When the mapped value is passed back to the TLS function, the bridge unwraps it to the original host array, satisfying the native type check. The TLS function then replaces the host thread's default CA set.

The complete exploit flow is:

attacker-controlled NodeVM program
  -> require only the allowed tls and url builtins
  -> URLSearchParams.getAll() creates a host array containing attacker CA PEM
  -> bridge unwraps the mapped array when passed back to tls
  -> tls.setDefaultCACertificates() replaces host default trust roots
  -> subsequent host-realm HTTPS client accepts attacker-signed certificates
  -> attacker can observe or modify application TLS traffic

The API is present in Node.js 22.19.0 and later in the 22.x line, and Node.js 24.5.0 and later in the 24.x line.

PoC

The attached PoC is fully local. It creates a temporary CA and a loopback HTTPS server signed by that CA, then performs two requests from the host realm.

  1. Install Node.js 22.19.0 or later in the 22.x line, or Node.js 24.5.0 or later in the 24.x line. OpenSSL must also be available.

  2. In the attached poc directory, run:

    npm install --ignore-scripts
    node poc.js
  3. A vulnerable result has all of these properties:

    • the first host request fails with a certificate verification error;
    • the sandbox reports that it supplied one host-realm CA entry;
    • the second host request succeeds with HTTP 200;
    • the second response body is VM2_POC_HOST_TLS_RESPONSE_3e71c8.

The server listens only on loopback and the PoC makes no external request.

Impact

This is an improper sandbox authorization boundary around a process-wide TLS security setting.

An attacker who can submit code to a NodeVM configured with the tls and url builtins can:

  • replace the CAs used by subsequent host-side HTTPS and TLS clients;
  • make the host authenticate services presenting certificates signed by the attacker;
  • intercept host credentials, API tokens, session data, request bodies, and responses when the attacker can influence DNS, routing, a proxy, or a later request destination;
  • modify trusted responses, including configuration, webhook, update, identity, and package-retrieval traffic;
  • remove the normal trusted roots and cause unrelated host TLS connections to fail.

The attacker does not obtain a direct file or command-execution primitive from this PoC. The critical impact is control of the host process's authentication trust decision, outside the sandbox's authority. Connections that explicitly provide their own CA list are not affected, and already cached TLS sessions may remain unchanged.

References

@patriksimek patriksimek published to patriksimek/vm2 Aug 24, 2026
Published to the GitHub Advisory Database Oct 1, 2026
Reviewed Oct 1, 2026
Last updated Oct 1, 2026

Severity

Critical

CVSS overall score

This score calculates overall vulnerability severity from 0 to 10 and is based on the Common Vulnerability Scoring System (CVSS).
/ 10

CVSS v3 base metrics

Attack vector
Network
Attack complexity
Low
Privileges required
None
User interaction
None
Scope
Changed
Confidentiality
High
Integrity
High
Availability
Low

CVSS v3 base metrics

Attack vector: More severe the more the remote (logically and physically) an attacker can be in order to exploit the vulnerability.
Attack complexity: More severe for the least complex attacks.
Privileges required: More severe if no privileges are required.
User interaction: More severe when no user interaction is required.
Scope: More severe when a scope change occurs, e.g. one vulnerable component impacts resources in components beyond its security scope.
Confidentiality: More severe when loss of data confidentiality is highest, measuring the level of data access available to an unauthorized user.
Integrity: More severe when loss of data integrity is the highest, measuring the consequence of data modification possible by an unauthorized user.
Availability: More severe when the loss of impacted component availability is highest.
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:L

EPSS score

Exploit Prediction Scoring System (EPSS)

This score estimates the probability of this vulnerability being exploited within the next 30 days. Data provided by FIRST.
(20th percentile)

Weaknesses

Incorrect Permission Assignment for Critical Resource

The product specifies permissions for a security-critical resource in a way that allows that resource to be read or modified by unintended actors. Learn more on MITRE.

CVE ID

CVE-2026-92941

GHSA ID

GHSA-98xx-8mx4-x7cm

Source code

Credits

Loading Checking history
See something to contribute? Suggest improvements for this vulnerability.